quarta-feira, 8 de junho de 2011

William Simon Jacques


Source: www.speakup.com.br
Language level: Pre-intermediate
Speaker: Jason Bermigham (American accent)
Justin Ratcliff (British)


William Simon Jacques

The Gentleman Thief is a famous figure in both fiction and reality, but Britain’s most prestigious libraries don’t like William Simon Jacques. This notorious criminal has stolen rare books from London’s British Library worth more than £1.000.000: one example is Galileo Galilei’s Sidereus Nuncius.

A GENIUS

Jacques studied at Cambridge University and he is a chartered account. He has the IQ of a genius and is a master of disguise. The English newspapers love him: They gave him the nickname “Tome Raider.” But he isn’t so intelligent after all. He was caught in 2002 and spent four years in prison. Jacques was arrested again in 2007 for stealing books from the Royal Horticulture Society valued at £40.000 was released on bail and ran. He was found and arrested at his mom’s home in 2009, and in June 2010 was convicted and sentenced to 3,5 years.

EMBARRASSING

How could Jacques steal such rare books for so many years? He uses his education to obtain librarians’ confidence, and uses false names and disguises, so that nobody can identify him. For example, at the Lindley Library he used the name Mr. Santoro instead of his real name.  Another important reason is that library curators don’t often inform the police when books are stolen. Antiquarian bookseller Jolyon Hudson explains: “Libraries are the curators of the nation’s knowledge. They’re too embarrassed to admit losing such important books.” Jacques sells the books with the help of auction houses like Christies of London and specialist book dealers. The police caught him in 1999 because a London book dealer saw that he was trying to cover library markings.

JAILED

“A leopard doesn’t change its spots.” The tabloid newspapers describe Jacques as a gentleman thief, but not everyone agrees. Jacques allegedly showed no remorse during this 2010 sentencing and his reputation has been damaged by his first conviction. The opposite of a gentleman is a scoundrel, and there are many people who say Jacques is exactly that: a scoundrel. His Cambridge University tutor Ian DuQuesnay angrily says: “What William Simon Jacques does is equivalent to splashing paint on the Parthenon.”

WHO EXATLY IS WILLIAM SIMON JACQUES?

He was born in 1969 in North Yorkshire. He studied economics at Cambridge University: his tutor Ian DuQuesnay remembers that he was “a competent, but not exceptional student.” He became an accountant and lived an apparently quiet life in London’s Maida Vale. Then in 1994 he obtained membership of Britain’s most prestigious libraries. In the following five years, he became the most prolific book thief in British history. The books he has stolen include Sir Isaac Newton’s Principia Mathematica (1687), Descartes’ Discourse de la Méthode por Bien Cunduire sa Reason (1637) and Kepler’s Astronomia Nova (1609).

John Paul Young 'Love Is In The Air'

For more info visit:

 http://www.englishexercises.org/makeagame/viewgame.asp?id=4720

Author of the Exercise : Teacher pawag
Agnes



Unscramble these words:
Love is in the  IRA
Everywhere I look  AOURND
Love is in the   IRA
Every sight and every  OUDNS
Write the verbs in correct form:


And I  (not / to know) if  (to be)  foolish
 (not / to know) if   (to be) wise
But it  (to be) something that I must believe in
And it  (to be)  there when I  (to look) in your eyes 
Look and write in the missing words:


  is in the air
In the whisper of the  
   is in the air
In the thunder of the  
Listen and write in the missing words:


And I don't know if I'm just  
Don't know if I feel  
But it's something that I must   in
And it's there when you call out my  


(Chorus)
Love is in the air
Love is in the air
Oh oh oh
Oh oh oh

Write in words of opposite meaning:


 (hatred) is in the air
In the rising of the  (moon)
 (hatred) is in the air
When the  (night) is nearly done 
Write in misssing words: illusion, that, when, if.


And I don't know if you're an 
Don't know  I see it true
But you're something  I must believe in
And you're there  I reach out for you 
Write in missing words:


Love is in the 
Every  and every sound
And I don't know if I'm  foolish
Don't  if I'm being wise


But it's something that I must believe in
And it's there when I look in your eyes 

PROERD, and The Project Travel Around the Past

Yesterday's morning me, Carlos (Tour guide) and pupils of 4º and 5º grade of Genius School went to the Archaeological Site Xique-Xique I, as well as the PROERD’s instructor Iranildo Pereira and Rosilena, Genius’ Teacher.  PROERD comes to the American project  (D.A.R.E) developed in Los Angeles in 1983 which means Drug Abuse Resistance Education presenting over 58 countries, in particular the purpose of PROERD is similar and the Instructor of the project in Carnaúba dos Dantas Iranildo Pereira, have been developing the project in partnership with the Secretaria of Education.
Back to the topic, juniors’ students of Genius have the opportunity to visit one of the most and relevant archaeological site guided by Carlos (Tour guide). As I told you before I develop Educative projects such as Travel Around The Past providing for local Students to valorize and develop the Education’s Heritage. Check it out the pictures below. 


   On the way of Xique-Xique pupils of Genius
  PROERD project similar to D.A.R.E Present in several countries, here in our region it has been developing by Teacher Iranildo Pereira, DARE means Drugs Abuse Resistant Education and this is Pupils' (4º and 5º grade) of Genius School folllowed by Teacher Rosilene and guided by me, Carlos Tour guide moderator of this blog.
   Crossing the Carnaúba's River
   Maria Arlinda, so cute baby...
   PROERD's Instructor Policeman Iranildo and Pupils of Genius
   Carlos Tour guide and Genius' pupils on the Xique-Xique I walkways
   Dancing and Hunting Scenes Xique-Xique I archaeological site.

The Oscars and The Golden Globes

AND THE WINNE IS...THE SAME PERSON!


Source: Speak Up

Making predictions is rarely a good idea as there is a strong possibility that you will be wrong. It’s difficult in sports matches, where there are two teams to choose from, but it’s even harder with film awards like the Golden Globes and the Oscars, where there are five nominees per category. Politicking by studios and actors that want to win and less forecasting by Hollywood journalists and deep secrecy by voters cloud the results for all unitl awards night.

THE GOLDEN GLOBES

The 83rd edition of the Academy Awards (which are organised by AMPAS, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences) took place at the Kodak Theatre on February 27 . Often – but not always – the Golden Globe Awards, which are held six weeks earlier, are a good indication. The members of the Hollywood Foreign Press Association (FPA: these are not the same people as the 6.000 members of the Academy of Motion Pictures.

COLIN FIRTH

British actor Colin Firth dominated Hollywood’s major awards this year, winning “Best Actor! For The King’s Speech at both the Globes and Oscars. The film is directed by Tom Hooper, who directed another “true life story.” The damned United. It the Damned United was about English soccer, then The King’s Speech is about the Royal Family. Firth plays George VI, the man who reluctantly became King of England (in 1936), when his brother, Edward VII, abdicated to marry an American divorcee, Wallis Simpson. George VI (who was the father of the present Queen) had a problem, he stuttered and this became particularly traumatic when he had to address the nation on radio during the Second World War. The film tells the story of his relationship with Lionel Logue, an Australian speech therapist. Logue is played by Geoffrey Rush, who was nominated for (but didn’t win) a Golden Globe or an Oscar for “Best Supporting Actor.” The film itself lost the “Best Picture” race at the Globes to The Social Network (aka “the Facebook movie), but won top prize at the Oscars.

JAMES FRANCO

James Franco was in a unique position on Oscar night serving a co-host of the show while also being a “Best Actor” nominee for his part in Danny Boyle’s disturbing movie. 127 Hours (that prize went to Firth). Boyle is famous for films like Slumdog Millionaire and Trainspotting, but this is far darker. Like The King’s Speech, 127 Hours tells a true story, that of Aron Ralston, a mountaineer in Utah who was obliged to take “drastic measures –i.e. amputating part of his arm with a penknife! – when he was trapped by a boulder. The films based on Ralston’s book. Between a Rock and a Hard Place. Language fans may like to know that this is a colloquial expression for a difficult situation, but in Ralston’s case it was literal.

PAUL GIAMATTI

The Golden Globes divide films into two categories: “Drama” and “Musical” or Comedy.” The prize for “Best Actor in a Musical or Comedy” went to Paul Giarmatti for Barney’s Version (he  wasn’t among the five nominated for the Oscars). The film, which won the Golden Lion Award at the Venice Festival, is based on the novel by the Canadian Mordecal Richier, sadly Richler died in 2010, but his story now lives on in cinema, thanks in part to the talent of Giamatti.

NATALIE PORTMAN

We apologise for dealing with the ladies last (and not first), but this is a Hollywood convention and not ours. Nowadays the word “actress” is considered politically incorrect: female stars are also “actors” The Oscars began in 1929 (and the Golden Globes in 1944) and so the female category in the award ceremonies is still called “Best Actress.” Natalie Portman won the Golden Globe for “Best Actress” in the “Drama” section, for her portrayal of an obsessive ballet dancer in Black Swan, and Annete Bening won the “Musical and Comedy” Golden Globe as a lesbian mother in The Kids Are All Right…On Oscar night there was just one “Best Actress” award to give out, and Portman beat Bening  and three others for the prize.

Among 11 award categories where the Globes and Oscars overlapped, eight winners were the same, reinforcing the popular theory that the Golden Globes are a good predictor of who’ll win the Academy Awards.