The net isn’t as important as we think

The net isn’t as important as we think

source: palavrasmentais.blogspot.com


Source: www.speakup.com.br

Ha-Joon Chang, born in South Korea in 1963, is an economist based at Cambridge University specializing in development. He is the author of several books, including Kicking Away the Ladder (2002) and Bad Samaritans: The Myth of Free Trade and the Secret History of Capitalism (2008). In his new book, 23 Things They Don’t Tell You About Capitalism (Alen Lane) Chang debunks many myths about the free market. In one chapter, he says. “The washing machine changed the world more than the internet.”

Is it really true that the washing machine has changed the world more than the internet? 

When we assess the impact of technological changes we send to downplay things that happened a while ago. Of course, the internet is great –I can now Google and find the exact location of a restaurant in Liverpool, or whatever. But when you look t the impact of this on the economy. It’s mainly in the area of leisure.

The internet may have significantly changed the working patterns of people like you and me, but we are in a small minority. For most people, its effect is more about keeping in touch with friends and looking up things here and there.  Economists have found very little evidence that since the internet revolution productivity has grown.

And the washing machine was more transformative?

By liberating women from household work and helping to abolish professions such as domestic service, the washing machine and other household goods completely revolutionised the structure of society. As women have become active in the labour market they have acquired a dfferent status at home –they will leave them and make an independent living. And this had enormous economic consequences. Rather than spend their time washing clothes, women could go out and do more productive things. Basically, it has doubled the workforce.

The washing machine is just one element here. Other factors have contributed to the liberation of women – feminism, the pill and so on.

Yes, but feminism couldn’t have been implemented unless there was this technological basis for a society where women went out and worked. Of course it’s not just the washing machine, it’s piped water, electricity, and so on.

Do we tend to overestimate the importance revolutions?

Not always. The invention of the printing press was one of the most important events in human history. But we overestimate the internet and ignore its downsides. There’s now so much information out there that you don’t actually have time to digest it.

SPEED

But what about the sheer speed at which it allows us to do things?

That is exaggerated too. Before the invention of the telegraph in the late 19^th century. It took two to three weeks to carry a message across the Atlantic. The telegraph reduced it to 20 to 30 minutes –an increase of 2.000 - 3.000 times. The internet has reduced the time of sending. Say, three or four pages of text from the 30 seconds you needed with a fax machine down to maybe two seconds – a reduction by a factor of 15. I can’t think of anything where it’s really so important that we send it in two seconds rather than a few minutes.

Do we fundamentally misunderstand the nature of capitalism, as the title of your book implies?

Let me start by saying that I am an advocate of capitalism. To paraphrase Winston Churchill. I think it’s the worst economic system except for all the others. So I’m not an anti-capitalism to work. But the version of capitalism that we have practised in the past two or three decades is a very extreme free market version which contrary to the claims of many economists, is not the only or best way to run things. There are many different ways and in the book I show that countries that I have run capitalism differently – even if they practise free-market capitalism today – have done much better.